--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Wrike? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Wrike gracias a Capterra República Dominicana. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Wrike - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra República Dominicana 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de gestión de proyectos](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [Wrike](/software/76113/wrike) # Wrike Canonical: https://www.capterra.do/software/76113/wrike Página: 1 de 123\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/76113/wrike?page=2) > Wrike es un software de gestión de proyectos empresariales con plantillas, control del tiempo, diagramas de Gantt, tablas Kanban, etc. > > Veredicto: 3037 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.4/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Wrike? Ideal para empresas medianas y corporaciones con equipos, que ejecutan proyectos y tienen varios clientes. Puedes adaptar Wrike a tus necesidades con flujos, campos e informes personalizados. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.4/5** | 3037 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Wrike - **Ubicación**: San Jose, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 2007 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio de partida**: US$10.00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Detalles de precios**: FREE: plan básico para equipos de hasta 5 usuarios: Proyectos y colaboradores ilimitados, características clave. Professional: $9.80 por usuario / mes Business: $24.80 por usuario / mes facturado anualmente Enterprise: para recibir precios precisos, póngase en contacto directamente con Wrike. - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, chino, chino tradicional, coreano, danés, español, francés, indonesio, inglés, italiano, japonés, neerlandés, noruego, polaco, portugués, ruso, sueco, ucraniano - **Países disponibles**: Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice, Benín y 202 más ## Funcionalidades - Almacenamiento seguro de datos - Análisis de gastos - Análisis financiero - Asset Lifecycle Management - Automatización de marketing - Base de datos de contactos - Búsqueda de texto completo - Calendario de marketing - Campañas multicanal - Captura de documentos - Chat y mensajería - Configuración de flujos de trabajo - Creación de informes financieros - Creación de informes para TI - Creación y diseño de formularios - Directorio de empleados - Directrices de marca - Diseño y modelado del proceso - Gestión de calendarios - Gestión de campañas - Gestión de canales - Gestión de capacidades - Gestión de clientes - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de la comunicación - Gestión de la disponibilidad - Gestión de objetivos - Gestión de revisión del rendimiento - Hoja de ruta del producto - Opciones de publicación de contenidos - Operaciones empresariales integradas - Planificación de actividades - Planificación de campañas - Planificación de capacidades - Planificación de proyectos - Planificación en sprint - Planificación estratégica - Programación - Programación a tiempo real - Programación de recursos - ROI Tracking - Recolección de registros - Revisión de documentos - Seguimiento de gastos - Seguimiento de horas de proyecto - Seguimiento de interacciones - Seguimiento de la asistencia - Seguimiento del proyecto - Sistema de calendarios o recordatorios - Workflow Automation … y 209 características más ## Integraciones (en total: 138) - AWS Lambda - Adobe Campaign - Adobe Creative Cloud - Airbrake - Airtable - Amazon Cognito - Amazon Lex - Amazon S3 - Anaplan - Apache Kafka - Asana - Ascent ERP - BambooHR - Basecamp - BigCommerce … y 123 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de gestión de proyectos](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software de gestión de proyectos](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Herramientas de colaboración](https://www.capterra.do/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Programas de automatización de servicios profesionales](https://www.capterra.do/directory/16/professional-services-automation/software) - [Herramientas de gestión de tareas](https://www.capterra.do/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Software de gestión de procesos](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.do/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9259 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.do/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15457 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.do/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13644 reviews) 4. [monday.com AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.do/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6095 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.capterra.do/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23594 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Herramienta potente" — 4.0/5 > **Yoelvis** | *19 de marzo de 2026* | Construcción | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Gestión potente y flexible, colaboración en tiempo real y gran capacidad de personalización para proyectos complejos. > > **Puntos en contra**: Curva de aprendizaje elevada, interfaz algo compleja y costos altos para equipos pequeños o necesidades básicas. > > Experiencia sólida y eficiente: gran control de proyectos y colaboración, aunque requiere tiempo para dominar todas sus funciones. ----- ### "Great for Managing Product Initiatives" — 5.0/5 > **suman** | *3 de julio de 2026* | Administración educativa | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Wrike provides fantastic workflow customization, clear dashboard visibility, and strong reporting capabilities-enabling us to see where features are developing, and what's most important. Their collaborative features are fantastic for directly linking conversations and activity back to the right tasks. Wrike's other productivity tool integrations keep our product development moving. > > **Puntos en contra**: Initial setup for this platform is a time-consuming process, and users need adequate training to maximize its functionality. The interface can get cluttered, and several customization options, and advanced reporting features are only available on premium plans. > > The experience overall for myself on Wrike has been really great. I use it for task coordination with product engineering feature developemnet, organize the product road map and with many other people. All of the tasks and timelines and updates with the product development on one platform simplifies me managing the whole process. ----- ### "An Excellent Platform for Managing Campaigns and Cross-Functional Projects" — 5.0/5 > **Ojas** | *30 de julio de 2026* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Wrike's intuitive project management capabilities and customizable dashboards made it easy to track tasks, manage campaigns, and collaborate across teams. The real-time visibility into project status, timelines, and dependencies helped improve efficiency and kept stakeholders aligned. I also appreciated the reporting features, which made performance tracking and resource planning much easier.Its task tracking, collaboration tools, and customizable workflows helped my team stay on schedule and communicate effectively. The platform provided excellent visibility into ongoing work and reduced the need for constant follow-ups.I found the customizable workflows, dashboards, and reporting tools particularly useful for managing complex campaigns and tracking progress in real time. It helped improve accountability, streamline communication, and ensure deadlines were met efficiently. The user-friendly interface also made adoption easy for different teams.Wrike significantly improved team collaboration, project visibility, and campaign execution efficiency, making it an essential tool for managing complex workflow. > > **Puntos en contra**: There isn't much to dislike, but the platform can feel overwhelming initially due to the number of features available. A simpler onboarding experience and more intuitive navigation for new users would make adoption easier. The platform has a learning curve, especially for new users. Some advanced features and customization options can feel overwhelming at first, and it can take time for teams to fully adopt and optimize the tool > > My overall experience with Wrike has been very positive. It is a robust and reliable project management platform that helps teams stay organized, collaborate effectively, and maintain visibility across projects. The ability to customize workflows, dashboards, and reports made it easy to adapt the tool to our team's specific needs. Wrike streamlined task management, improved communication among stakeholders, and provided real-time insights into project progress, helping us meet deadlines more consistently. While there is a learning curve for some of the advanced features, the benefits in terms of productivity, accountability, and project transparency far outweigh the initial setup effort. Overall, Wrike has been a valuable tool for managing complex projects and enhancing team efficiency. ----- ### "Wrike Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *8 de junio de 2026* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 4.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I like that we are able to hold team members accountable, the reporting helps make it easy to see the types of projects worked on, and that we can have other teams within the Wrike platform but they dont have access to our marketing spaces. > > **Puntos en contra**: They make a lot of changes with 0 to little notice. And when the changes are made the training isnt great and when we worked with our Rep she gives us incorrect information (on more than one occasion). This is why when anyone on our team has Wrike issues we submit a ticket vs reaching out to the people on our account. > > Its been fine. We enjoy the platform but have been very upset with things being discontinued, items being changed, and our representatives. We will probably reevalute the platform at the end of our contract to see if there is another one we can use. ----- ### "Our team runs on Wrike now and we have almost no issues with it" — 5.0/5 > **Anastasia** | *26 de mayo de 2026* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The cross-tagging is literally the first real game-changer for how our team works and so instead of having to create and maintain two separate versions of the same task/project, when something impacts both marketing and ops teams, you don’t have to duplicate anything or follow-up on multiple teams. I am beat from today and needed to write this down before i forgot about what i was saying. The Gantt view in Wrike is probably one of the better views i’ve used. The ability to drag dependencies around and have everything flow without breaking (this seems like a no-brainer), has been a pain point for many other platforms. Blueprints will likely also reduce your overall setup time if you’re creating similar types of projects, as once you get your blueprint set up correctly; you won’t be building from scratch every single time. > > **Puntos en contra**: I find that the dashboard builder is somewhat underwhelming relative to the power of the rest of the application. While you’ll be able to get very basic widgets into the dashboard, most of the more detailed reporting capabilities require far too much clicking and sometimes the data just doesn’t report out in the manner that you’d expect. Request forms work fine, however new users often need to be walked through where their submissions end up post-submission, as it’s not clear. It may seem minor, but the notification section becomes cluttered quickly and i haven’t found a good way to clean it out without getting into settings and adjusting the noise levels. In terms of cost structure – there isn’t a lot of flexibility with the pricing tiers. Some of the really valuable features such as time-tracking reports and automated trigger functionality are restricted by higher tier plans. > > Prior to using Wrike, we were updating project status via email chains, keeping track of tasks via spreadsheets and checking-in on project status via Slack messages — none of which were connected. Thus, each question received approximately 4 different answers in 4 different places. Now all of these questions have a central location to receive an answer and because they’re tied together (contextually) including comments, files, and historical status updates – they get completed much faster and more accurately than when they existed in someone’s email box. ----- Página: 1 de 123\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/76113/wrike?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.do/software/76113/wrike) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados