--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de NavRisk? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de NavRisk gracias a Capterra República Dominicana. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: NavRisk - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra República Dominicana 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de gestión de reclamaciones](/directory/30029/claims-processing/software) > [NavRisk](/software/68177/navrisk) # NavRisk Canonical: https://www.capterra.do/software/68177/navrisk Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/68177/navrisk?page=2) > DAVID Corporation es el desarrollador de NAVRISK VISION, la solución de automatización de gestión más poderosa del mercado de riesgo alternativo. > > Veredicto: 14 usuarios lo han valorado con **3.2/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa NavRisk? La experiencia de la empresa se centra en soluciones de software de gestión de riesgos y seguros para grupos de riesgo de entidades públicas, administradores externos (TPA) y empresas autoaseguradas. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **3.2/5** | 14 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 2.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 3.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 2.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 3.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 40% | (4/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: DAVID - **Ubicación**: Wakefield,, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 1984 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio de partida**: US$40,000.00 - **Público objetivo**: 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funcionalidades - Alertas y notificaciones - Emisión de políticas - Evaluación de riesgos - Facturación - Gestión de auditorías - Gestión de clientes - Gestión de controles internos - Gestión de la conformidad - Gestión de la evaluación de riesgo - Gestión de renovaciones - Presupuestos y estimaciones - Reclamaciones electrónicas - Seguimiento de reclamaciones ## Opciones de asistencia - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de gestión de reclamaciones](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30029/claims-processing/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software de gestión de reclamaciones](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30029/claims-processing/software) - [Software para gestionar pólizas de seguro](https://www.capterra.do/directory/20036/insurance-policy/software) - [Software para gestión de riesgos](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30665/risk-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [A1 Tracker](https://www.capterra.do/software/166909/a1-tracker) — 4.9/5 (79 reviews) 2. [Esker](https://www.capterra.do/software/121233/esker-accounts-payable) — 4.6/5 (38 reviews) 3. [Scrut Automation](https://www.capterra.do/software/1052809/scrut) — 4.9/5 (138 reviews) 4. [Onspring](https://www.capterra.do/software/138931/audit-software) — 4.8/5 (105 reviews) 5. [LogicGate Risk Cloud](https://www.capterra.do/software/148648/logicgate) — 4.7/5 (83 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "We were an early adopter of NavRisk and have been pleased since the roll out." — 5.0/5 > **Paul** | *29 de noviembre de 2017* | Administración gubernamental > > **Puntos a favor**: Ease of accessibility even from the field. We can access it when we are at meetings with out laptops with no need for a special connection. I love that I can even access it from my iPhone. > > **Puntos en contra**: The document generation via letters in the system. The old silver light version was not that great and the newer version it replaced is even worse. ----- ### "Has everything we need and great customer service" — 4.0/5 > **Cassandra** | *4 de diciembre de 2017* | Construcción | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The value and the customer service, it has everything we need for claim's software. The company is very friendly as well. > > **Puntos en contra**: Hard to use, can have some issues when inputting data. Not user-friendly. I have to write down a lot of the step by step directions. ----- ### "Disappointing. Web based program not as functional as we had hoped. Renaissance was better." — 3.0/5 > **Pattijo** | *8 de diciembre de 2017* | Valoración de la recomendación: 3.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Having web-based software is ideal for traveling. The EDI reporting works efficiently most of the time which is critical since electronic reporting is required of insurers in MT. The response time is consistently good. This was a concern when we began looking at webbased software. Creating trouble tickets is easy. We periodically get emails requesting our opinion and we're asked if we have any concerns. If we had more time we would take more advantage of support when its offered. The annual contract service fee is reasonable. > > **Puntos en contra**: SAP Reporting has been the biggest problem. Running reports is slow. The formatting /shading of the reports uses too much paper and ink. The drop-downs default to oldest dates. This is particularly a problem in medical review. The MT fee schedule is updated annually. When we enter CPT code, system defaults to the oldest fee schedule. We have to scroll down to select the newest fee schedule amounts. Unecessarily time consuming. Default needs to be changed to grab the newest date. It's baffling to us that this hasn't been fixed. It doesn't seem we are the only insurer that this affects. > > Web based software allows us to work claims when we're traveling. ----- ### "I process changes to the policies and issue certificates of insurance" — 4.0/5 > **Denise** | *5 de diciembre de 2017* | Seguros | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I like the overall layout of the screens-easy to read and quick to look up items such as particular vehicles and properties by typing a few letters. > > **Puntos en contra**: too many tabs to go through for looking at a particular item and more steps in processing work and the process to do certificates is not user friendly as I am unable to revise a certificate holder name (I have to add a new item to the list of certificate holders). > > Better layout of information and user friendly in some items (looking up particular vehicles, properties, finding a member). ----- ### "My experience with NavRisk Vision has been extremely disappointing." — 2.0/5 > **Michael** | *4 de diciembre de 2017* | Seguros | Valoración de la recomendación: 0.0/10 > > **Puntos en contra**: No commas for amounts in many places, e.g. claims summary and detail tabs. This makes it very difficult to tell the amount of large numbers (we have claims that are over $1.0 million). NavRisk Vision report cannot be scheduled to run automatically. This is a feature that has been part of the David Corp claims software since 1988. When exporting files out of NavRisk Vision the default file type is for Chrystal Reports rather than the pdf format. Bulk payments - claim number has to be reentered for each payment, reverts to first claim in the bulk payments. Certain check printing features that were in prior systems are no longer available. Problems with 1099 reporting. ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/68177/navrisk?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.do/software/68177/navrisk) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Datos estructurados