--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Campaign Manager Aristotle? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Campaign Manager Aristotle gracias a Capterra República Dominicana. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Campaign Manager Aristotle - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra República Dominicana 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software para campañas electorales](/directory/30221/political-campaign/software) > [Campaign Manager Aristotle](/software/55431/campaign-manager) # Campaign Manager Aristotle Canonical: https://www.capterra.do/software/55431/campaign-manager Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/55431/campaign-manager?page=2) > Rastrea y administra operaciones de recaudación de fondos, presenta informes estatales y federales de cumplimiento, entre otras capacidades. > > Veredicto: 12 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.8/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Campaign Manager Aristotle? Cualquier campaña grande o pequeña, independientemente de la ideología o filiación política. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.8/5** | 12 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.7/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 100% | (10/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Aristotle International - **Constitución**: 1982 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio de partida**: US$250.00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500 - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funcionalidades - Base de datos de contactos - Creación de informes y estadísticas - Gestión de donantes - Gestión de la recaudación de fondos - Marketing por correo electrónico - Pagos en línea - Political Campaign Management ## Integraciones (en total: 1) - Anedot ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Software para campañas electorales](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30221/political-campaign/software) ## Alternativas 1. [CallHub](https://www.capterra.do/software/149279/callhub) — 4.4/5 (248 reviews) 2. [NGP VAN](https://www.capterra.do/software/148396/ngp-van) — 4.2/5 (62 reviews) 3. [ISPolitical](https://www.capterra.do/software/147516/integrated-solutions-political) — 4.9/5 (31 reviews) 4. [Donorbox](https://www.capterra.do/software/156860/donorbox) — 4.8/5 (624 reviews) 5. [Ecanvasser](https://www.capterra.do/software/156872/ecanvasser) — 4.0/5 (93 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Saving me time and money" — 5.0/5 > **Greg** | *15 de mayo de 2020* | Organización política | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Campaign Manager allows me to keep track of active donors in my state and develop data-driven fundraising strategies for campaigns small and large. Having all my records and notes archived in one place is incredibly efficient, saving me time and money. > > **Puntos en contra**: It doesn't negatively affect my interaction with the software but I feel like the developers have tried to provide more features than is necessary. Focus on what makes the product great and drop the features not being used. ----- ### "Excellent Product" — 5.0/5 > **Bryan** | *4 de junio de 2020* | Organización política | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: In my line of work, time is the most value asset I have is time. The import and de-duplication tools are a huge time saver for me. Moreover, the data entry sequence layouts are presented in a way that streamlines my data entry in a fast and methodical way. Donor analytics is paramount to raising more money for the campaign. Having the ability to identify donor history and giving patterns, helps my committees better craft direct mail and digital fundraising pieces. We can target donor history and patterns, more thoroughly, identifying donors at varying contribution levels to maximize our fundraising efforts. > > **Puntos en contra**: The speed and the register display. At times, the register does not total correctly. Additionally, the undeposited funds displays in the register. I wish it would not do that. > > The speed of Campaign Manager is extremely beneficial. Often overlooked and taken for granted, the program moves quick. I’ve used other software programs that move slow, do not respond quickly and time out often. Nothing is more frustrating than not being able to do your job because the software is moving slow. ----- ### "Good software and helpful tool for GR shops." — 4.0/5 > **Jared** | *8 de diciembre de 2016* | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Customer Service and built in web forms. > > **Puntos en contra**: Too many features and sometimes it crashes. > > I've used Aristotle for a couple of years now and there are some functions that could be better, but overall it is a helpful tool for our GR campaigns and they are always willing to reach out and help solve an issue. ----- ### "won't work without it" — 5.0/5 > **Laura** | *10 de abril de 2020* | Organización política | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Total functionalilty - expecially with tressury and reporting features. We mainly use it for this event though it has many overall campaign management features > > **Puntos en contra**: For budgeting, I would like to split expense categories when entering expenses. Currently I have to do multiple expense entries even though I wrote one check to a vendor across several categories. > > I simply will not take a client who won't use it. It is relatively expensive, but I know that a credible client wants the best tools available. It's also a sign to me that they take compliance seriously. ----- ### "It's all in the details" — 4.0/5 > **Leslie** | *16 de abril de 2020* | Organización política | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The detailed notes, categories, codes, and ability to track every little detail. > > **Puntos en contra**: There have been times it was quite clunky to run a report. It appears many reports are easier to run than they used to be. When searching for a person--say first name "A" last name Griffin it should bring up first letter A and all last name Griffins, but instead pulls up many first names beginning with other letters--so that is frustrating. > > I've used CM for over fifteen years, so overall, I think it's one of the best. However, I had better more efficient and quicker technical support when CM was not part of Aristotle. The technical support is frustrating and inefficient, particularly when one has a client that is demanding. ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/55431/campaign-manager?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.do/software/55431/campaign-manager) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Datos estructurados