--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de ProjectWise? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de ProjectWise gracias a Capterra República Dominicana. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ProjectWise - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra República Dominicana 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de gestión de contenidos CMS](/directory/10007/content-management/software) > [ProjectWise](/software/205660/projectwise) # ProjectWise Canonical: https://www.capterra.do/software/205660/projectwise Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/205660/projectwise?page=2) > Mejora el rendimiento de tu proyecto integrando personas, datos y procesos durante todo el ciclo de vida del proyecto. > > Veredicto: 31 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.2/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa ProjectWise? Diseñado para mejorar el rendimiento del proyecto de diseño, ingeniería y construcción, ProjectWise es una herramienta basada en la nube que se centra en la colaboración y la visibilidad en tiempo real del progreso del proyecto. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.2/5** | 31 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 3.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 3.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 3.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Bentley Systems - **Ubicación**: Exton, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 1980 ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, chino, chino tradicional, coreano, español, francés, inglés, italiano, japonés, neerlandés, polaco, portugués, ruso - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funcionalidades - Biblioteca de contenidos - Búsqueda de texto completo - Control de versiones - Controles o permisos de acceso - Creación de informes/análisis - Formularios electrónicos - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de formularios - Gestión de proyectos - Gestión de tareas - Herramientas de colaboración - Modelado del diseño - Modelos personalizables - Opciones de publicación de contenidos - Priorización - Seguimiento de la conformidad - Seguimiento del tiempo - Task Editing - Third-Party Integrations ## Integraciones (en total: 1) - Microsoft SharePoint ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 ## Categoría - [Software de gestión de contenidos CMS](https://www.capterra.do/directory/10007/content-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software de gestión de contenidos CMS](https://www.capterra.do/directory/10007/content-management/software) - [Herramientas de gestión de tareas](https://www.capterra.do/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Software de gestión del flujo de trabajo (workflow)](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) - [Programas BIM](https://www.capterra.do/directory/31000/bim/software) - [Other Construction Software](https://www.capterra.do/directory/34536/other-construction/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Revit](https://www.capterra.do/software/183122/revit) — 4.6/5 (484 reviews) 2. [Autodesk Forma](https://www.capterra.do/software/218046/autodesk-construction-cloud) — 4.3/5 (2212 reviews) 3. [monday AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.do/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6121 reviews) 4. [PlanRadar](https://www.capterra.do/software/156698/PlanRadar) — 4.4/5 (77 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.do/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3042 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Great data-sharing product regardless of your platform\!" — 5.0/5 > **Michael** | *21 de junio de 2018* | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Ability to share data anywhere in the world. The workflows and the ability to automate so many aspects of the sheet creation process is a huge time saver. We use it for Bentley, Microsoft, and Autodesk software without major issues. > > **Puntos en contra**: Upgrading the software can be a quite daunting task. The ability to integrate some of the more complex pieces of software Autodesk develops could use some attention. > > Project data sharing next to none\! ----- ### "SUDOP PRAHA a.s." — 5.0/5 > **Jaroslav** | *18 de julio de 2023* | Ingeniería civil | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Working with files. The security of using a single valid copy of a document in a network with geographically distant branches. When implementing Projectwise, a company must modify its existing workflows. When implementing Projectwise, the firm must unify the versions of software used. > > **Puntos en contra**: We implemented Projectwise between 2000 and 2002. It took a long time to get the integration with the software products right. First of all Bentley products, then Microsoft Office. The experience from the semi-second implementation in the company's subsidiary made the implementation easier. However, there are still problems with the integration of Autodesk products, especially Revit, Civil 3d and Autocad. > > In our experience, there is still a need to adapt employees to working in Projectwise. People are bothered by the different way of handling files when copying, renaming , working with images. They compare file handling too much with products like totalcommander and windows explorer. A big problem is the unreliable collaboration with Autodesk products. We are very negative about Projectwise support especially in 2016-2021. We missed detailed tutorials and explanations of new Projectwise features, slow bug fixing especially for new web services. Working in the Projectwise client was trouble-free all the time. It worked reliably ----- ### "Projectwise review" — 3.0/5 > **Philippe** | *17 de julio de 2023* | Construcción | Valoración de la recomendación: 3.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The automatic production of 2D drawings with the pdf rendition is high valuable when using Bentley products.The interface for the use is quite classic but people gets used to it. > > **Puntos en contra**: The configuration of Projectwise workflows is awful, there is no other words. The interface is dificult, and editing an excel file for such a critical thing such as workflows is a nightmare. The documentation is not good concerning the tool as well. > > It is a mixed experience. For some aspects it is very good but for some others it s terrible and not modern at all. ----- ### "A well rounded collaborative tool" — 4.0/5 > **Audrey** | *10 de mayo de 2022* | Ingeniería civil | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I have used Projectwise for many projects with different teams - sometimes international teams around the world. My experience has always been decently pleasant. Projectwise has an advantage over its new competitor BIM360, because you can collaborate on MANY DIFFERENT FILES TYPES. Word docs, CAD drawings, Microstation drawings, spreadsheets, etc. This is where ProjectWise wins. It has an audit trail and you can customize the environment and document control for each project. You can also adjust permission settings as needed. The speed of working on drawings is efficient, since it makes a local copy and you're only affected by slow network issues when pushing your work to the server. > > **Puntos en contra**: It does have a steep initial learning curve e.g. understanding check in vs server update vs open/checkout etc. There should be explanations \& definitions built in to the UI because improper use of some of the tools can be catastrophic. > > I have used ProjectWise at many companies for many projects, and it has always been a powerful and useful collaboration tool. It does require training for the initial learning curve so we do always account for that in our project schedules. ----- ### "software user" — 4.0/5 > **Jeff** | *17 de julio de 2023* | Ingeniería industrial o mecánica | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Checking out and returning files from and to the software is easily done > > **Puntos en contra**: Ability to find files by client name, and uploading files, wishing we could drag and drop from our workstations. > > Security of documents is very good ----- Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/205660/projectwise?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.do/software/205660/projectwise) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Datos estructurados