--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Endtest? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Endtest gracias a Capterra República Dominicana. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Endtest - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra República Dominicana 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de automatización de pruebas](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [Endtest](/software/180545/endtest) # Endtest Canonical: https://www.capterra.do/software/180545/endtest Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/180545/endtest?page=2) > Pruebas automatizadas sin programación. Impulsado por aprendizaje automático. > > Veredicto: 45 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.3/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Endtest? Creado para empresas que desarrollan aplicaciones web y móviles. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.3/5** | 45 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Endtest - **Constitución**: 2016 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio de partida**: US$178.00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funcionalidades - Admite la ejecución en paralelo - Verificación de scripts de test - Vista jerárquica ## Opciones de asistencia - Asistencia 24/7 ## Categoría - [Herramientas de automatización de pruebas](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Alternativas 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.do/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (752 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.do/software/170732/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 3. [Katalon Studio](https://www.capterra.do/software/1018018/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 4. [SoapUI](https://www.capterra.do/software/170648/soapui) — 4.5/5 (168 reviews) 5. [Cypress](https://www.capterra.do/software/168276/cypress) — 4.7/5 (67 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Feature-packed - Easy to use and setup" — 4.0/5 > **Maarten** | *29 de octubre de 2019* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It took less than half a day to get acquainted and up to speed with Endtest. We quickly had the first test cases set up. The ability to schedule test runs and invoke the tests through a URL are really helpful. > > **Puntos en contra**: Endtest offers support for the most popular and recent browser versions. Would be great if older versions and less popular browsers can be tested in the same way. > > We ensure proper operation of new releases for our customers. Better quality, happier customers\! ----- ### "Excellent product" — 4.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *7 de julio de 2020* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: There are a lot of things. I can't just name a few > > **Puntos en contra**: Codeless automated testing. It has never helped me automate any stuff. > > It was great experience. Maybe you guys can improve the mobile automation a little better. There are a lot errors there. I have already mentioned it to Matt, who is doing an excellent job. ----- ### "Decent Option for Cross-Browser/Device Testing" — 3.0/5 > **Glen** | *9 de noviembre de 2018* | Hostelería | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Navigation is intuitive and the page loads quickly to ensure a good work pace. Broad support for different browsers and devices. If statement support and database connection/querying is also nice. > > **Puntos en contra**: Lack of in-browser action recording features, no option to export/import to/from Selenium or other popular frameworks. No option for global or suite-level variables, and test-level variables are not displayed in an easy to view UI. > > One division of our company does use this for testing of our public-facing website. My team and I mostly work on internal tools for the company's finance team. I was unable to see a compelling reason to use this over GhostInspector or Mabl, both of which seem better suited for functional testing. The wide variety of device/browser compatibility is impressive, but not strictly necessary for our particular business needs. I think if EndTest had action recording, that would be a different story. ----- ### "A beginner testers view" — 5.0/5 > **Inguna** | *14 de julio de 2020* | Internet | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Video recordings of test execution were very helpful in determining if I need to tweak my test steps. Also, the gratifying moment when the test was run successfully. > > **Puntos en contra**: Editing test steps could be easier, such as changing the sequence of steps without having to completely delete and write a new step. I would also have liked to reuse some parts of tests, sort of like a library of snippets that you can build. > > I did manual testing before trying Endtest. Even with my relatively limited technical knowledge, I was still able to learn how to set up tests properly. ----- ### "Automating work and tests with unparalleled ease" — 4.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *18 de agosto de 2021* | Bibliotecas | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The ease of use of Endtest is great. I came from automating manually with Python, which was a lot slower. Now I can press record, do the test, and it's as good as done. Just add some logic with the easy-to-navigate Action menu to finish up. > > **Puntos en contra**: One of the few things that I miss, compared with 'manual' programming, is being able to copy individual lines of code/actions. There is an option to copy/move an entire test case however. > > So far we have automated some easy jobs which were previously manually processed. We're also busy setting up scheduled regression tests. ----- Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/180545/endtest?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.do/software/180545/endtest) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados