--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Wordable? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Wordable gracias a Capterra República Dominicana. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Wordable - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra República Dominicana 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Plataformas para blogs](/directory/30898/blog/software) > [Wordable](/software/157691/wordable) # Wordable Canonical: https://www.capterra.do/software/157691/wordable Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/157691/wordable?page=2) > Aplicación que transfiere publicaciones de blogs de Google Docs a Wordpress con solo hacer clic en un botón. > > Veredicto: 87 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.7/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Wordable? Especialistas en marketing de contenidos, blogueros independientes, blogueros afiliados, empresas de medios y editores de blogs. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.7/5** | 87 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.7/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Wordable - **Constitución**: 2016 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio de partida**: US$99.00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bangladés, Baréin, Benín, Bielorrusia, Bolivia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Botsuana, Brasil y 173 más ## Funcionalidades - Biblioteca de contenidos - Biblioteca de imágenes - Búsqueda/filtro - Controles o permisos de acceso - Editor WYSIWYG - Gestión de SEO - Gestión de contenidos - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de páginas web - Herramientas de colaboración - Opciones de publicación de contenidos ## Integraciones (en total: 3) - HubSpot Content Hub - Medium by Adobe - WordPress ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Base de conocimientos - Chat ## Categoría - [Plataformas para blogs](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30898/blog/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Plataformas para blogs](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30898/blog/software) - [Software de gestión de contenidos CMS](https://www.capterra.do/directory/10007/content-management/software) - [Herramientas ECM](https://www.capterra.do/directory/31079/enterprise-content-management/software) - [Herramientas de marketing de contenidos](https://www.capterra.do/directory/30796/content-marketing/software) - [Software para gestionar publicaciones y suscripciones](https://www.capterra.do/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) ## Alternativas 1. [WordPress](https://www.capterra.do/software/131687/wordpress) — 4.6/5 (14971 reviews) 2. [Brandfolder](https://www.capterra.do/software/133103/brandfolder) — 4.7/5 (445 reviews) 3. [Paperflite](https://www.capterra.do/software/163946/paperflite) — 4.9/5 (98 reviews) 4. [WoodWing Studio](https://www.capterra.do/software/217246/woodwing-studio) — 5.0/5 (1 reviews) 5. [Flipsnack](https://www.capterra.do/software/176854/flipsnack) — 4.6/5 (307 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "This tool is the perfect example of what a single function tool should be. 100% recommend." — 5.0/5 > **Jacob** | *22 de febrero de 2018* | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Before Wordable, I couldnt use Google Docs if the document's final destination was Wordpress. Transferring was a nightmare and you would essentially have to reformat the entire post while re-adding the images. I love using Google Docs. It's simple yet highly functional, and it's the best shared editing experience online. Wordable allows me to fully utilize Google Docs and then transfer to Wordpress with a single click. It works flawlessly. It's dirt cheap. And it saves me hundreds of hours every year. > > **Puntos en contra**: At first, I loved the tool but the pricing was a bit higher than I would have hoped to pay. I paid it anyway, because it was worth it, but since they dropped the price, there is literally no downside to this product. > > It does exactly what it promises: flawlessly transfers my Google Docs to Wordpress with one click. ----- ### "Wordable Review" — 4.0/5 > **Oladipo** | *9 de febrero de 2022* | Medios de difusión | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Wordable is a good software that speed up transfer process into WordPress which is majorly and widely used by content creators and bloggers. Its simple and easy to learn interface make my work my work easy on a daily basis. The fact that it's integrated with google docs and WordPress make it much more good. > > **Puntos en contra**: It doesn't upload large images, but it's still good as it performs majority of what it's needed for. > > Very great experience ----- ### "Wordable is buggy and unintuitive. Avoid it like COVID." — 1.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *14 de enero de 2021* | Edición | Valoración de la recomendación: 0.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: This product is \*supposed\* to take articles written in Google Docs and publish them on your Wordpress site. However, it has become borderline impossible to actually do that without running into at least one issue along the way. I can honestly say that there is nothing I like about this software. > > **Puntos en contra**: It is ridiculously buggy, it is difficult and confusing to use, and it is very expensive, considering what it's actually built to accomplish. > > I used Wordable for multiple years, and it was just OK. Not great. It was kind of confusing and clunky, but it worked. After the latest update, it is completely unusable. So much so that I am here writing a review to encourage other people to avoid wasting their time and money on this tool. ----- ### "This tool is a lifesaver\!\! Now I cannot work without it.." — 5.0/5 > **Nissar** | *11 de febrero de 2018* | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: - Ability to seamlessly import articles from your Google Docs directly into WordPress (with a single click) - All images and links are also moved over (no more downloading and uploading) - Unlimited articles for fixed monthly price - The ROI on time far exceeds the cost. I publish about 50-60 articles a month on my site. Most of them are contributor submissions. Wordable saves me atleast 5-10 minutes per article. - Easy integration or setup - Customer support is awesome. I send them an email and they get back to me within 24 hours. > > **Puntos en contra**: -- I shouldn't say this as deal breaker - these are more like suggestions for product enhancements. Right now all articles are imported into the same author and category. It will be very useful if I can choose beforehand (in Wordable) which Author, category, tags, that I want to add before moving as a draft in WordPress. > > Saves me tons of time and energy. I no longer have to save article submissions on to my desktop. I can seamlessly export new posts directly into WordPress. Most importantly - images and links are intact and they show up in WordPress. ----- ### "Exactly what your writing team needs" — 5.0/5 > **Andrew** | *4 de febrero de 2020* | Servicios financieros | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Wordable seamlessly integrated into our editorial process that starts with a Google Doc and ends in Wordpress. It's push-button easy. Minimal configuration and really just gets out of the way so the team can focus on their work. > > **Puntos en contra**: Nothing, it's great and any roadblock we've had we just contact support and they've been ultra-responsive and accommodating. > > Our writing team writes the first draft of their articles in Google Docs. Then our editor goes in, comments and there's a back and forth until the article content is "finished". Then, when our editor is happy, he push-button imports the final copy into Wordpress, does some last-minute formatting tweaks and that's it. Editing is challenging in Wordpress directly as it requires a lot of verbose explanations in team chat which eats time and many times is completely skipped by our editor and they just make the changes directly. The time of our editor is the most valuable/constrained on the team so allowing them to effectively lean on Google Docs as part of the process is a huge cost/effeciency move for us. ----- Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.do/software/157691/wordable?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.do/software/157691/wordable) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados